14 Final 28 9 Final 20 7 Final 42 14 Final 51 7 Final 38 31 Final 35 45 Final 19 9 Final 56 24 Final 34 0 Final 34 20 Final 27 13 Final 16 14 Final 62 48 Final 45 0 Final 66 17 Final 45 3 Final 77 22 Final 44 10 Final 42 7 Final 55 22 Final 32 31 Final 42 0 Final 70 36 Final 27 12 Final 59 43 Final 36 13 Final 20 6 Final 45 24 Final 38 16 Final 27 30 Final 23 7 Final 31 20 Final 34 17 Final 72 27 Final 26 6 Final 28 33 Final 30 3 Final 69 17 Final 45 7 Final 31 10 Final 17 10 Final 42 18 Final 16 20 Final 38 17 Final 20 14 Final 56 21 Final 20 6 Final 54 3 Final 56 14 Final 56 9 Final 63 3 Final 35 33 Final 31 24 Final 21 21 Final 45 17 Final 21 38 Final 16 20 Final 3 7 Final 68 10 Final 38 3 Final 45 35 Final 9 28 Final 23 40 Final 42 20 Final 59 13 Final 24 0 Final 68 44 Final 20 0 Final 13 17 Final 34 7 Final 23 20 Final 24 3 Final 42 0 Final 73 23 Final 30 10 Final 34 14 Final 21 17 Final 42 3 Final 48 13 Final 36 3 Final 27 10 Final 70 20 Final 37
Week 2 • September 06, 2025, 07:30 PM UTC
Bowling Green
20
1-0
MAC
Power Rank: -9.1
@
FINAL
34
Cincinnati
0-1
Big 12
Power Rank: 9.5

Cincinnati defeated Bowling Green 34–20 in a double-digit victory.

By · Last updated

General Information

Week: Week 2
Kick Off (at stadium): 03:30 PM EDT
Stadium: Nippert Stadium
Capacity: 38,088
Elevation: 778 ft
HFA Rating: 2.5
Playing Surface: Artifical Turf

Betting Information

Spread None
Total (O/U) -
Odds Implied Score -
Power Rank Implied Line Cincinnati -18.6
Prediction Markets Cincinnati 93% Win Chance (Kalshi)

Line Value Calculator

Adjust any factor to update your projected line

Your line Cincinnati +18.6
Implied value —
Current line — edit to adjust
Cincinnati perspective
Power ratings — edit to adjust
Bowling Green
Cincinnati
Home field — Nippert Stadium
Weather: Moderate snow
Travel impact

Positive adjustment = favours home team

Bowling Green @ Cincinnati Preview

Weather Conditions

Forecast for: February 02, 2026
Moderate snow

Moderate snow

28.4°F

Wind Chill: 21.1°F
Wind: 6.7 mph SW
Gusts: 10.5 mph
Precipitation: 0.01"
Humidity: 97%
Rain Chance: 100%
Snow Chance: 100%

Travel & Rest

Bowling Green (Away)

This Week: 162.1 miles
Last Week: Home Game
Season Total: 1313.2 miles
Body Clock Time: 15:30
Rest Days: 9

Cincinnati (Home)

This Week: 0.0 miles
Last Week: 1071.2 miles
Season Total: 2760.4 miles
Body Clock Time: 15:30
Rest Days: 8

What are the key factors for Bowling Green vs Cincinnati?

Bowling Green: Key Factors

Offensive Struggles Continue

Bowling Green managed only 272 total yards, below their season average of 300.3, and both quarterbacks combined for a 9-of-26 passing performance with one touchdown and two interceptions, highlighting persistent offensive inefficiency.

Defensive Resilience but Late Collapse

The Falcons' defense forced a stop with 2:12 remaining and set up a potential game-winning drive, but a critical interception by Hunter Najm with a minute left squandered the opportunity, underscoring a pattern of late-game defensive lapses.

Special Teams and Field Position Battle

Bowling Green's special teams contributed a 15-yard punt return to set up good field position, but the offense failed to capitalize, while Akron's Matthew Schramm made four field goals, including a career-long 48-yarder, to control the scoring.

Quarterback Inconsistency

Hunter Najm threw two interceptions, including a game-ending pick, and the passing game was ineffective overall, with both quarterbacks completing only 34.6% of passes, indicating a need for improved quarterback play in future games.

Season-Ending Disappointment

The loss sealed a 3-8 record and a second-to-last-place MAC finish in Eddie George's debut season, marking a disappointing end to the year and raising questions about offensive and quarterback development moving forward.

Cincinnati: Key Factors

Late-Season Collapse Continues

Cincinnati lost its fourth straight game, finishing the regular season on a four-game losing streak after being ranked 17th and in contention for the Big 12 title and a College Football Playoff spot.

Defensive Struggles Against TCU

The Bearcats allowed 45 points and 306 passing yards with four touchdowns from TCU quarterback Josh Hoover, who had a Big 12-worst 13 interceptions entering the game but threw none against Cincinnati.

Offensive Bright Spots from Sorsby

Quarterback Brendan Sorsby threw three touchdown passes and completed 23 of 33 passes for 282 yards without an interception, including a 35-yard TD to Cyrus Allen, but it wasn't enough to overcome the deficit.

November Woes Continue

Cincinnati is now 1-11 in November games under head coach Scott Satterfield, highlighting a recurring late-season struggle that also cost them a bowl bid last year.

Bowl Game Outlook Uncertain

The Bearcats will wait for their bowl assignment, but their four-game losing streak and poor November record raise concerns about their ability to finish the season strong.

What happened in the game?

Bowling Green travels 162 miles to this game, a short road trip.

Cincinnati won by 14 in a double-digit victory.

Does weather affect this game at Nippert Stadium?

At 28.4°F, this is a cold-weather game. Cold conditions below 35°F historically compress scoring and reduce passing efficiency, favouring unders and run-heavy offences.

Precipitation chance is 100%, pointing to a wet-field game. High precip probability increases fumble risk and typically compresses both team totals.

Full conditions are shown in the data panel above. Forecast data sourced from WeatherAPI.com. Use the Line Value Calculator to apply a manual weather adjustment to your projected line.

How do Bowling Green and Cincinnati compare on power ratings?

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings favour Cincinnati (9.5) over Bowling Green (-9.1) by 18.6 points on a neutral field. After adding home field advantage, the rating-implied line may differ meaningfully from the market spread. Cincinnati brings a meaningful home field advantage to this matchup (Blue Chip HFA: 2.5). Add this to the neutral-site differential to arrive at a venue-adjusted line.

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings represent expected point margin against an average FBS opponent on a neutral field, calculated from game data sourced via CollegeFootballData.com (CFBD). They are one input — cross-reference with the travel, rest, and weather data above before drawing conclusions.

Where can I find more data on Bowling Green and Cincinnati?

Sources

Game & Team Data

Weather

Travel & Rest

Model & Methodology

Cincinnati won this game.