Week 2 • September 07, 2025, 01:00 AM UTC
17
0-0
FCS
Power Rank: -27.6
@
FINAL
42
0-1
CUSA
Power Rank: -15.2

UTEP defeated UT Martin 42–17 to secure a comfortable win.

General Information

Week: Week 2
Kick Off (at stadium): 07:00 PM MDT
Stadium: Sun Bowl
Capacity: 51,500
Elevation: 3904 ft
HFA Rating: 2.4
Playing Surface: Artifical Turf

Betting Information

Spread None
Total (O/U) -
Odds Implied Score -
Power Rank Implied Line UTEP -12.4
Prediction Markets UTEP 73% Win Chance (Kalshi)

Line Value Calculator

Adjust any factor to update your projected line

Your line UTEP +12.4
Implied value
Current line — edit to adjust
UTEP perspective
Power ratings — edit to adjust
UT Martin
UTEP
Home field — Sun Bowl
Weather: Clear
Travel impact

Positive adjustment = favours home team

UT Martin @ UTEP Preview

Weather Conditions

Forecast for: February 02, 2026
Clear

Clear

43.0°F

Wind Chill: 39.6°F
Wind: 5.6 mph ESE
Gusts: 7.8 mph
Precipitation: 0.0"
Humidity: 43%
Rain Chance: 0%
Snow Chance: 0%

Travel & Rest

UT Martin (Away)

This Week: 1058.4 miles
Last Week: 916.8 miles
Season Total: 2479.2 miles
Body Clock Time: 20:00
Rest Days: 10

UTEP (Home)

This Week: 0.0 miles
Last Week: 1495.9 miles
Season Total: 5101.2 miles
Body Clock Time: 19:00
Rest Days: 8

What are the key factors for UT Martin vs UTEP?

UT Martin: Key Factors

Offensive Struggles

UT Martin managed only 221 total yards, with just 71 rushing yards, and quarterback Jase Bauer completed 19 of 27 passes for 122 yards but no touchdowns. The offense failed to score until a late 1-yard run by Thomas Ansley, indicating a lack of explosive plays and red-zone efficiency.

Turnover Issues

The Skyhawks committed three turnovers, which contributed to Missouri State's early 35-0 lead. Protecting the ball will be critical in future games to avoid giving opponents short fields and momentum.

Defensive Lapses

UT Martin's defense allowed 42 points, including 35 in the first half, and gave up 271 passing yards and 65 rushing yards to Missouri State. The inability to stop the run or contain the quarterback's dual-threat ability was a major factor in the blowout loss.

Winless Start

With the loss, UT Martin falls to 0-4 on the season, putting pressure on the team to find consistency and avoid a winless campaign. The team must address both offensive and defensive weaknesses to compete in upcoming games.

UTEP: Key Factors

Skyler Locklear's Four-Touchdown Performance

Locklear accounted for four touchdowns (two passing, two rushing) and threw for 244 yards, but his pick-six gave Jacksonville State a crucial score. His dual-threat ability is a key weapon, but turnovers remain a concern.

Wondame Davis Jr.'s Breakout Game

Davis had a career-high 166 receiving yards on five catches, including a 75-yard touchdown. He emerged as a deep threat and could be a focal point of the passing attack moving forward.

Defensive Struggles Against the Run

UTEP allowed 259 rushing yards to Creel and Cook, including a game-winning field goal drive set up by a 31-yard scramble. The run defense must improve to keep games close.

Late-Game Execution Issues

Despite leading or tying late, UTEP allowed a 46-yard drive and game-winning field goal with 53 seconds left. Closing out games and preventing big plays in crunch time is a critical area for improvement.

What happened in the game?

UT Martin travels 1,058 miles to this game, a significant road trip.

UT Martin arrives with a 1-hour body clock shift.

UTEP won by 25 to secure a comfortable win.

How do UT Martin and UTEP compare on power ratings?

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings favour UTEP (-15.2) over UT Martin (-27.6) by 12.4 points on a neutral field. After adding home field advantage, the rating-implied line may differ meaningfully from the market spread. UTEP brings a meaningful home field advantage to this matchup (Blue Chip HFA: 2.4). Add this to the neutral-site differential to arrive at a venue-adjusted line.

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings represent expected point margin against an average FBS opponent on a neutral field, calculated from game data sourced via CollegeFootballData.com (CFBD). They are one input — cross-reference with the travel, rest, and weather data above before drawing conclusions.

Sources

Weather

UTEP won this game.