14
Final
28
9
Final
20
7
Final
42
14
Final
51
7
Final
38
31
Final
35
45
Final
19
9
Final
56
24
Final
34
0
Final
34
20
Final
27
13
Final
16
14
Final
62
48
Final
45
0
Final
66
17
Final
45
3
Final
77
22
Final
44
10
Final
42
7
Final
55
22
Final
32
31
Final
42
0
Final
70
36
Final
27
12
Final
59
43
Final
36
13
Final
20
6
Final
45
24
Final
38
16
Final
27
30
Final
23
7
Final
31
20
Final
34
17
Final
72
27
Final
26
6
Final
28
33
Final
30
3
Final
69
17
Final
45
7
Final
31
10
Final
17
10
Final
42
18
Final
16
20
Final
38
17
Final
20
14
Final
56
21
Final
20
6
Final
54
3
Final
56
14
Final
56
9
Final
63
3
Final
35
33
Final
31
24
Final
21
21
Final
45
17
Final
21
38
Final
16
20
Final
3
7
Final
68
10
Final
38
3
Final
45
35
Final
9
28
Final
23
40
Final
42
20
Final
59
13
Final
24
0
Final
68
44
Final
20
0
Final
13
17
Final
34
7
Final
23
20
Final
24
3
Final
42
0
Final
73
23
Final
30
10
Final
34
14
Final
21
17
Final
42
3
Final
48
13
Final
36
3
Final
27
10
Final
70
20
Final
37
Alabama defeated UL Monroe 73–0 in a dominant performance.
Adjust any factor to update your projected line
Positive adjustment = favours home team

30.3°F
The Warhawks managed only 14 points, extending their losing streak to seven games. Quarterback Aidan Armenta threw for 166 yards and ran for a touchdown, but the offense lacked consistency and big plays.
Texas State's Brad Jackson accounted for four touchdowns (2 passing, 2 rushing) and 289 total yards, exposing ULM's defense to mobile quarterbacks. The Warhawks allowed 31 points and struggled to contain Jackson's scrambling.
ULM cut the deficit to 24-14 with 7:37 left in the fourth quarter after a 10-play, 75-yard drive, but could not complete the comeback. The team showed resilience but lacked the firepower to overcome the deficit.
The Warhawks' rushing attack was limited, forcing them to rely heavily on the pass. Without a balanced offense, they were unable to sustain drives or control the clock against Texas State.
Alabama finished with minus-3 rushing yards and 209 total yards, hindered by the absence of running back Jam Miller (lower leg). The team managed only 17 rushing yards on nine carries in the first half, including two by wide receivers and one by quarterback Ty Simpson. This inability to establish a ground game put immense pressure on the passing attack and limited offensive efficiency.
The Crimson Tide converted only 3 of 13 third-down attempts, reflecting a lack of sustained drives. Additionally, they failed to capitalize on scoring opportunities, with their only touchdown coming on a 23-yard pass from Ty Simpson to Germie Bernard early in the fourth quarter when the game was already out of reach.
Alabama committed a critical turnover when Daylon Everette intercepted Ty Simpson's pass, leading to a Georgia touchdown. Additionally, a blocked punt by Cole Speer set up another Georgia score. These mistakes gave Georgia short fields and allowed them to build a 21-0 lead before Alabama could respond.
The lopsided loss to Georgia raises concerns about Alabama's College Football Playoff standing. Despite being ranked No. 9 in the CFP rankings entering the game, the defeat could cause the committee to drop them out of the playoff field, especially given their inability to compete with a top-tier opponent.
Alabama had historically been successful against Georgia when trailing at halftime (3-0 under Kirby Smart), but this time they could not mount a comeback. After falling behind 14-0 at halftime, the Crimson Tide managed only one touchdown in the fourth quarter, failing to replicate their 2018 SEC championship rally.
UL Monroe travels 267 miles to this game, a short road trip.
Alabama won by 73 in a dominant performance.
At 30.3°F, this is a cold-weather game. Cold conditions below 35°F historically compress scoring and reduce passing efficiency, favouring unders and run-heavy offences.
Full conditions are shown in the data panel above. Forecast data sourced from WeatherAPI.com. Use the Line Value Calculator to apply a manual weather adjustment to your projected line.
Blue Chip Analytics power ratings favour Alabama (25.3) over UL Monroe (-19.7) by 45.0 points on a neutral field. After adding home field advantage, the rating-implied line may differ meaningfully from the market spread. Alabama brings a meaningful home field advantage to this matchup (Blue Chip HFA: 2.7). Add this to the neutral-site differential to arrive at a venue-adjusted line.
Blue Chip Analytics power ratings represent expected point margin against an average FBS opponent on a neutral field, calculated from game data sourced via CollegeFootballData.com (CFBD). They are one input — cross-reference with the travel, rest, and weather data above before drawing conclusions.
Alabama won this game.