Week 2 • September 06, 2025, 11:45 PM UTC
0
1-0
Sun Belt
Power Rank: -19.7
@
FINAL
73
0-1
SEC
Power Rank: 25.3

Alabama defeated UL Monroe 73–0 in a dominant performance.

General Information

Week: Week 2
Kick Off (at stadium): 06:45 PM CDT
Stadium: Bryant-Denny Stadium
Capacity: 100,077
Elevation: 253 ft
HFA Rating: 2.7
Playing Surface: Grass

Betting Information

Spread None
Total (O/U) -
Odds Implied Score -
Power Rank Implied Line Alabama -45.0
Prediction Markets Alabama 98% Win Chance (Kalshi)

Line Value Calculator

Adjust any factor to update your projected line

Your line Alabama +45.0
Implied value
Current line — edit to adjust
Alabama perspective
Power ratings — edit to adjust
UL Monroe
Alabama
Home field — Bryant-Denny Stadium
Weather: Clear
Travel impact

Positive adjustment = favours home team

UL Monroe @ Alabama Preview

Weather Conditions

Forecast for: February 02, 2026
Clear

Clear

30.3°F

Wind Chill: 25.2°F
Wind: 4.7 mph WSW
Gusts: 10.1 mph
Precipitation: 0.0"
Humidity: 78%
Rain Chance: 0%
Snow Chance: 0%

Travel & Rest

UL Monroe (Away)

This Week: 266.7 miles
Last Week: Home Game
Season Total: 585.7 miles
Body Clock Time: 18:45
Rest Days: 9

Alabama (Home)

This Week: 0.0 miles
Last Week: 539.8 miles
Season Total: 911.3 miles
Body Clock Time: 18:45
Rest Days: 7

What are the key factors for UL Monroe vs Alabama?

UL Monroe: Key Factors

Offensive Struggles Continue

The Warhawks managed only 14 points, extending their losing streak to seven games. Quarterback Aidan Armenta threw for 166 yards and ran for a touchdown, but the offense lacked consistency and big plays.

Defensive Vulnerability Against Dual-Threat QB

Texas State's Brad Jackson accounted for four touchdowns (2 passing, 2 rushing) and 289 total yards, exposing ULM's defense to mobile quarterbacks. The Warhawks allowed 31 points and struggled to contain Jackson's scrambling.

Late Rally Falls Short

ULM cut the deficit to 24-14 with 7:37 left in the fourth quarter after a 10-play, 75-yard drive, but could not complete the comeback. The team showed resilience but lacked the firepower to overcome the deficit.

Ineffective Run Game

The Warhawks' rushing attack was limited, forcing them to rely heavily on the pass. Without a balanced offense, they were unable to sustain drives or control the clock against Texas State.

Alabama: Key Factors

Offensive Line and Run Game Struggles

Alabama finished with minus-3 rushing yards and 209 total yards, hindered by the absence of running back Jam Miller (lower leg). The team managed only 17 rushing yards on nine carries in the first half, including two by wide receivers and one by quarterback Ty Simpson. This inability to establish a ground game put immense pressure on the passing attack and limited offensive efficiency.

Third-Down and Red Zone Inefficiency

The Crimson Tide converted only 3 of 13 third-down attempts, reflecting a lack of sustained drives. Additionally, they failed to capitalize on scoring opportunities, with their only touchdown coming on a 23-yard pass from Ty Simpson to Germie Bernard early in the fourth quarter when the game was already out of reach.

Turnovers and Special Teams Mistakes

Alabama committed a critical turnover when Daylon Everette intercepted Ty Simpson's pass, leading to a Georgia touchdown. Additionally, a blocked punt by Cole Speer set up another Georgia score. These mistakes gave Georgia short fields and allowed them to build a 21-0 lead before Alabama could respond.

Playoff Hopes in Jeopardy

The lopsided loss to Georgia raises concerns about Alabama's College Football Playoff standing. Despite being ranked No. 9 in the CFP rankings entering the game, the defeat could cause the committee to drop them out of the playoff field, especially given their inability to compete with a top-tier opponent.

Inability to Overcome Halftime Deficit

Alabama had historically been successful against Georgia when trailing at halftime (3-0 under Kirby Smart), but this time they could not mount a comeback. After falling behind 14-0 at halftime, the Crimson Tide managed only one touchdown in the fourth quarter, failing to replicate their 2018 SEC championship rally.

What happened in the game?

UL Monroe travels 267 miles to this game, a short road trip.

Alabama won by 73 in a dominant performance.

Does weather affect this game at Bryant-Denny Stadium?

At 30.3°F, this is a cold-weather game. Cold conditions below 35°F historically compress scoring and reduce passing efficiency, favouring unders and run-heavy offences.

Full conditions are shown in the data panel above. Forecast data sourced from WeatherAPI.com. Use the Line Value Calculator to apply a manual weather adjustment to your projected line.

How do UL Monroe and Alabama compare on power ratings?

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings favour Alabama (25.3) over UL Monroe (-19.7) by 45.0 points on a neutral field. After adding home field advantage, the rating-implied line may differ meaningfully from the market spread. Alabama brings a meaningful home field advantage to this matchup (Blue Chip HFA: 2.7). Add this to the neutral-site differential to arrive at a venue-adjusted line.

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings represent expected point margin against an average FBS opponent on a neutral field, calculated from game data sourced via CollegeFootballData.com (CFBD). They are one input — cross-reference with the travel, rest, and weather data above before drawing conclusions.

Sources

Weather

Alabama won this game.